The nuclear energy “live debate”
Posted by Luke Weston on March 31, 2008
A great debate over the importance of nuclear energy as an important source of clean energy is currently happening over at Green Options and promises to be exceptionally broad ranging. Rod Adams of Atomic Insights is starring in the debate, along with Matt Simmons, a sustainability consultant and engineer who writes regularly for TalkClimateChange, who is taking the argument against nuclear energy.
It looks like a very interesting debate to keep an eye on.
Not to be too judgemental - but personally, I think there’s a recurring theme to Matt’s posts thus far: combined-cycle dangerous fossil fuel turbines, combined dangerous fossil fuel heat and power cogeneration, and the dangerous fossil fuels oracle or shill, depending on who you ask, Amory Lovins.
If nuclear energy costs only 5% more than the combined-cycle dangerous fossil fuel turbine, which discharges its dangerous fossil fuel waste straight into the atmosphere, why would you reject nuclear energy?
I’ll be watching this one with interest.
Posted in Amory Lovins, Rod Adams, dangerous fossil fuels, debate, natural gas, nuclear energy | Tagged: Amory Lovins, dangerous fossil fuels, debate, natural gas, nuclear energy, Rod Adams | 3 Comments »
