The President’s Guide to Science
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1424386236177531815
Here’s another very good science documentary from the BBC’s Horizon program.
As President Richard Nixon awarded the prestigious National Science Medal to a group of scientists, he was heard to say: “I have read the citations and I want you to know that I do not understand them, but I want you to know, too, that because I do not understand them, I realise how enormously important their contributions are to this nation.”
In order to make the best decisions regarding important issues as diverse as energy, the environment, nuclear weapons proliferation, anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, abortion, biotechnology and embryonic stem-cell research, and the role of nuclear power, and how to ensure that it is used most effectively, the President of the United States really needs to have ready access to advisers who are scientifically literate, and abreast of the details of developments in science and technology.
To examine some key issues where the next President of the United States really should be well advised about the intricacies of scientific and technological issues, the Horizon team have assembled a panel of notable scientists, including Neil DeGrasse Tyson, British Nobel-laureate biochemist Sir Paul Nurse, the controversial Professor Richard Dawkins, the notable theoretical physicist Professor Michio Kaku, and a few more, to examine these key contemporary issues of science in society.
Michio Kaku is none too fond of nuclear power – although, since he is clearly somebody who most physicists will at least hear out, and he’s clearly scientifically literate, one cannot help but think that perhaps Kaku is in a unique position to elucidate his scientific argument as to why, scientifically, nuclear energy is not safe, or that there is some intractable dilemma presented by radioactive byproduct materials.
4 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- October 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (9)
- October 2008 (20)
- September 2008 (11)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (5)
-
Categories
- ABC
- Abengoa Solar
- abuse of units
- academia
- activism
- alternative energy
- americium
- Amory Lovins
- analytical science
- Andrew Bolt
- ANSTO
- anthropogenic climate change
- anthropogenic greenhouse gases
- anti-nuclear activism
- anti-nuclear ignorance
- anti-nuclear movement
- anti-nuclear quote of the day
- anti-nuclear quote of the week
- anti-nuclear-energy activism
- anti-nuclear-energy dogma
- anti-nuclear-energy ignorance
- anti-nuclear-energy stupidity
- atmospheric science
- atomic engines
- Australia
- Australia 2020
- Australian Greens
- AWU
- bad science
- banana dose
- Barack Obama
- beryllium
- black holes
- blogging
- blogs
- Blue marble
- books
- bullshit
- cap and trade
- carbon dioxide
- cargo cult science
- Carl Sagan
- CCS
- CERN
- chemistry
- Chernobyl
- China
- clean coal
- clean energy
- climate change
- coal
- coal mining
- community engagement
- construction time for nuclear energy
- construction time for renewable energy
- cost of solar energy
- cost of solar power
- cost of wind power
- dangerous fossil fuels
- David Lochbaum
- debate
- defence
- democracy
- depleted uranium
- desalination
- dirty bombs
- distributed energy
- dubious claims
- Earth Hour
- earth science
- economics
- economics of solar power
- education
- Edward Teller
- EFMR monitoring network
- electric vehicles
- electricity generation
- electronics
- emissions trading
- energy
- energy analysis
- energy conversion
- energy demand
- energy density
- energy economics
- energy generation
- energy independance
- energy intensity
- energy policy
- energy politics
- energy resources
- energy systems
- energy technology
- environment
- environmental protection
- environmental remediation
- environmental science
- environmentalism
- EROEI
- Europe
- fast reactors
- Feynman
- Fischer-Tropsch
- fossil fuel waste
- fossil fuels
- france
- free energy
- fruitcake
- FUD
- fuels
- fusion
- Garnaut review
- gas turbines
- Gavin Mudd
- geeky stuff
- genepax
- georeactor
- georeactor hypothesis
- geosequestration
- GNEP
- greenhouse forcing
- greenhouse gas emissions
- greenhouse gas emissions reduction
- greenhouse gases
- Hanford
- Hans Bethe
- health effects of energy systems
- health physics
- heat engines
- Helen Caldicott
- humor
- hydrogen
- HyperCar
- Hyperion
- IDGCC
- idiocy
- IFR
- industry
- Integral Fast Reactor
- IPCC
- Israel
- italy
- John Gofman
- John McCain
- John Wheeler
- Joseph Mangano
- Joseph Romm
- junk science
- Kansas
- Kashiwazaki-Kariwa
- Kentucky
- Kevin Rudd
- kilotons
- Kyoto protocol
- Large Hadron Collider
- LFTR
- LHC
- life-cycle analysis
- linear no-threshold
- linear-non-threshold
- linux.conf.au
- liquid fluoride reactor
- loan guarantees
- Manhattan Project
- Mark Lynas
- materials science
- media
- Media irresponsibility
- meet the millirem
- microcontrollers
- micropower
- Middle East
- mineral extraction
- mineral resources
- mining
- Naive Environmentalist Quote of the Day
- nanomaterials
- natural gas
- natural nuclear fission reactors
- neutrinos
- neutron science
- new build
- NNadir
- not even wrong
- nuclear astrophysics
- nuclear bailout
- nuclear chemistry
- nuclear debate
- nuclear energy
- nuclear energy economics
- nuclear energy institute
- nuclear engineering
- nuclear fission
- nuclear fuel cycle
- nuclear fuels
- nuclear fusion
- nuclear madness
- nuclear medicine
- nuclear physics
- nuclear power
- nuclear power education
- nuclear proliferation
- nuclear pulse propulsion
- nuclear reactors
- nuclear reprocessing
- nuclear safety
- nuclear terrorism
- nuclear waste
- nuclear weapons
- nukefree.org
- numbers
- Oklo
- olympic dam
- OPAL
- open hardware
- oxygen
- Paducah
- particle physics
- petroleum
- photovoltaics
- physics
- planetary science
- plutonium
- politics
- polling
- pollution
- probabilities
- proliferation
- proliferation studies
- propaganda
- psuedoscience
- public policy
- radiation
- radiation hormesis
- radiation safety
- radioactive decay
- radioactive waste
- radioactivity
- radionuclides in the environment
- radiophobia
- radon
- reactor physics
- reactor technology
- renewable energy
- renewable energy costs
- renewable energy economics
- renewables
- reprocessing
- resources
- rhetoric
- risk
- Rod Adams
- Russia
- safety of energy systems
- science
- scientific method
- Scott Ludlam
- SLS
- small-scale nuclear power
- society
- solar
- solar energy
- solar power
- solar thermal
- space exploration
- stars
- StormSmith
- sustainability
- sustainable energy
- synroc
- Syria
- terminology
- The Oil Drum
- their actions
- thermal engines
- thermodynamics
- thorium
- three mile island
- transportation
- Uncategorized
- unions
- units
- uranium
- uranium mining
- uranium resources
- van Leeuwen
- Victoria
- VVER
- waste
- water
- water use of energy systems
- white elephant
- wind energy
- wind power
- Yucca Mountain
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Have you heard Kaku’s arguments against nuclear power? They are almost childlike in their naivete!
His alternative: solar. I realize that many physicists these days like solar (probably because they are intrigued by the condensed matter physics that goes into their design), but they seem to almost universally lack the perspective of how much solar would be required and why this is not practical.
(Of course, it’s not surprising that Kaku’s research involves something that is completely theoretical, without any experimental evidence [yet] to support it.)
If Kaku is seriously involved and influential, then I weep for our future.
Yeah, certainly – Kaku’s argument is essentially just the familiar old “it’s dangerous and there’s the waste and we don’t know what to do with the waste” – which is really astonishing and surprising, coming from a professor of physics.
If he really believes that nuclear fission power is no good (he’s positive and optimistic about fusion), he really should elucidate why, in a scientifically sound fashion – he’s clearly scientifically literate – instead of just sounding like any Greenpeace representative off the street.
I knew Kaku 30 years ago in NY during the anti-war movement. He’s on the far left was an organizer around the Nuclear Freeze (weapons) in the 1980s. He is literate, but caught the antis religion during TMI. There is no hope for him.
D.
I was rather disappointed by the narrator’s pronunciation of nuclear, as “nucular”. I expected better of the BBC.