<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case-control study of lung cancer risk from residential radon exposure in Worcester County, Massachusetts.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/</link>
	<description>An independent scientist's observations on society, technology, energy, science and the environment.         "Modern science has been a voyage into the unknown, with a lesson in humility waiting at every stop. Many passengers would rather have stayed home." - Carl Sagan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Coriedord</title>
		<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Coriedord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-997</guid>
		<description>hi, you got some exact pleasant posts here

uncommonly useful and practical information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, you got some exact pleasant posts here</p>
<p>uncommonly useful and practical information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radiationhormesis</title>
		<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>radiationhormesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-918</guid>
		<description>This confirms Cohens findings years ago, more info here http://radiationhormesis.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This confirms Cohens findings years ago, more info here <a href="http://radiationhormesis.com" rel="nofollow">http://radiationhormesis.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DV82XL</title>
		<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>DV82XL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-579</guid>
		<description>he evidence against the linear model and for radiation hormesis has been solid as a rock for 40 years. Yet the LNT model prevails. Why? Follow the money and the politics. Health-physics science is divided, roughly along the lines of who puts money before principles. There have been some amazingly bitter fights within the health physics community.  A look at the historical background of radiation research is instructive. 

After World War II, the details were released of the A-bombing of Japan. Studies  of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, showed a linear relationship between cancer mortality and high doses of radiation as a result fallout hysteria became one of the themes of the times. The situation was not helped by lurid stories of several high dose incidents reported in the press.  Health Physics and Genetics were supported lavishly by radiation fears, and Radiation Biology became the most intensely researched science in history. Health physicists soon learned that their livelihood depended upon scaring funds out of governments and science became irrelevant if the paymasters wanted to mislead the public about the hazards of radiation.  If a particular study failed to find evidence of radiation’s ill effects, the data was simply forced into the LNT model. Yet some of these studies are among the best evidence for radiation hormesis because the authors were not looking for it, and effectively denied that it existed.

The justification for using the LNT model was that too many test animals or too much time would be needed to evaluate chronic dose rates. If the LNT model is correct, there is no &quot;no observed adverse effect level&quot; (NOAEL) for regulators to observe, thus officials responsible for public health can claim justification in calling for minimization of exposures to ionizing radiation.  Note that this is tantamount to saying that avoiding sunlight is justified on the grounds that nobody will get sunburns in the dark.  Added to this, during the Cold War a number of people promoted the LNT model in an attempt to discourage all uses of nuclear weapons and nuclear power, and used it as leverage in their campaigns.

No, it won&#039;t go away easily, but who would have thought a Black would be running for President of the U.S or that gay folks would get married openly thirty years ago? Things do change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he evidence against the linear model and for radiation hormesis has been solid as a rock for 40 years. Yet the LNT model prevails. Why? Follow the money and the politics. Health-physics science is divided, roughly along the lines of who puts money before principles. There have been some amazingly bitter fights within the health physics community.  A look at the historical background of radiation research is instructive. </p>
<p>After World War II, the details were released of the A-bombing of Japan. Studies  of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, showed a linear relationship between cancer mortality and high doses of radiation as a result fallout hysteria became one of the themes of the times. The situation was not helped by lurid stories of several high dose incidents reported in the press.  Health Physics and Genetics were supported lavishly by radiation fears, and Radiation Biology became the most intensely researched science in history. Health physicists soon learned that their livelihood depended upon scaring funds out of governments and science became irrelevant if the paymasters wanted to mislead the public about the hazards of radiation.  If a particular study failed to find evidence of radiation’s ill effects, the data was simply forced into the LNT model. Yet some of these studies are among the best evidence for radiation hormesis because the authors were not looking for it, and effectively denied that it existed.</p>
<p>The justification for using the LNT model was that too many test animals or too much time would be needed to evaluate chronic dose rates. If the LNT model is correct, there is no &#8220;no observed adverse effect level&#8221; (NOAEL) for regulators to observe, thus officials responsible for public health can claim justification in calling for minimization of exposures to ionizing radiation.  Note that this is tantamount to saying that avoiding sunlight is justified on the grounds that nobody will get sunburns in the dark.  Added to this, during the Cold War a number of people promoted the LNT model in an attempt to discourage all uses of nuclear weapons and nuclear power, and used it as leverage in their campaigns.</p>
<p>No, it won&#8217;t go away easily, but who would have thought a Black would be running for President of the U.S or that gay folks would get married openly thirty years ago? Things do change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryfry</title>
		<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>bryfry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Heh ... Sorry, Joffan. I wouldn&#039;t hold my breath, if I were you.

LNT is simply too convenient for too many people for a wide variety of reasons. It won&#039;t go away so easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh &#8230; Sorry, Joffan. I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath, if I were you.</p>
<p>LNT is simply too convenient for too many people for a wide variety of reasons. It won&#8217;t go away so easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joffan</title>
		<link>http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/08/12/case-control-study-of-lung-cancer-risk-from-residential-radon-exposure-in-worcester-county-massachusetts/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joffan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-577</guid>
		<description>RIP LNT? One can only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP LNT? One can only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
