Comments on: Indian Point Nuclear Dead Baby World Tour! http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/ An independent scientist's observations on society, technology, energy, science and the environment. "Modern science has been a voyage into the unknown, with a lesson in humility waiting at every stop. Many passengers would rather have stayed home." - Carl Sagan Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:19:13 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: enochthered http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/#comment-237 enochthered Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:24:00 +0000 http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-237 Well, I really think that solar has a big drawback in that it can't practically be scaled to gigawatt-scale capacity, especially not with energy storage on that scale. There's no such thing as risk-free or drawback-free energy - only drawback-minimised energy - and that's nuclear energy. Well, I really think that solar has a big drawback in that it can’t practically be scaled to gigawatt-scale capacity, especially not with energy storage on that scale.

There’s no such thing as risk-free or drawback-free energy – only drawback-minimised energy – and that’s nuclear energy.

]]> By: Hank http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/#comment-236 Hank Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:03:47 +0000 http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-236 There aren't a lot of good options available. Everywhere you look just about every energy source except solar has big drawbacks. There aren’t a lot of good options available. Everywhere you look just about every energy source except solar has big drawbacks.

]]> By: enochthered http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/#comment-235 enochthered Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:43:00 +0000 http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-235 With regards to the above comment, as most of us know, it is entirely false to assume that all advocates of nuclear energy are right-wing Bush-supporting fundamentalist Christians, just as not all opponents of nuclear energy are far-left pot-smoking Marxists. (Sorry for the poor sterotypes, but you get my point.) With regards to the above comment, as most of us know, it is entirely false to assume that all advocates of nuclear energy are right-wing Bush-supporting fundamentalist Christians, just as not all opponents of nuclear energy are far-left pot-smoking Marxists.

(Sorry for the poor sterotypes, but you get my point.)

]]> By: djysrv http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/#comment-234 djysrv Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:25:30 +0000 http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-234 Blog idaho Samizdat has news and updates on the Indian Point relicesing issues. http://djysrv.blogspot.com/2008/03/indian-point-under-fire.html Blog idaho Samizdat has news and updates on the Indian Point relicesing issues.

http://djysrv.blogspot.com/2008/03/indian-point-under-fire.html

]]> By: Paul http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/indian-point-nuclear-dead-baby-world-tour/#comment-232 Paul Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:54:01 +0000 http://enochthered.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-232 All these liberals talking about dad babies from IPEC's operation themselves favor abortion (calling it the "right to choose" - choose what, death?) and their policy has resulted inthe murder of 50 million babies since Roe v Wade made infanticide legal. We need to tell the truth. The liberals, the Dems and the anti-nukes (all one and the same) are the baby-murderers, NOT IPEC. All these liberals talking about dad babies from IPEC’s operation themselves favor abortion (calling it the “right to choose” – choose what, death?) and their policy has resulted inthe murder of 50 million babies since Roe v Wade made infanticide legal. We need to tell the truth. The liberals, the Dems and the anti-nukes (all one and the same) are the baby-murderers, NOT IPEC.

]]>