Project Orion
Whilst browsing the videos on Dr. Buzzo’s YouTube channel, I came across a nice one – a segment from Carl Sagan’s legendary television series Cosmos talking about interstellar spaceflight, and the technologies we could use to achieve interplanetary manned spaceflight.
Now, maybe I just read too much Carl Sagan works, but I happen to get a little bit passionate about such things.
Now, something important to note: Every technology, with one single exception, that of a large enough solar sail, that has ever been seriously considered or developed by humanity as the means to send a manned spacecraft beyond our solar system, or even to the outer part of our solar system, utilizes some form of nuclear engineering as its energy source.
But nuclear engineering – fission reactors, fusion reactors, or bomb-like nuclear pulse propulsion – does give us the means to do it, where no other energy systems can.
A spacecraft capable of manned interstellar travel would, in my opinion, be the most fantastic triumph of human engineering ever devised. Something fantastic, at the limits of human imagination. And such technology already exists. We simply lack the political fortitude to use it.
It’s quite depressing, almost, to note that we have the means to travel to other stellar systems, and colonize and live there, in all likelihood, well within a human lifetime, but we do not. Not because our science precludes it, our our technology, or our vision, or our intelligence, or our wealth preclude it, but because politicians preclude it.
Now, after watching this video, I happened across another very, very good video on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l2QopJbDBs
This is a recent-ish TED talk given by George Dyson (son of the notable British-American mathematician and physicist Freeman Dyson) about Project Orion.
The video he mentions – of the very successful experiments with the scaled-down models powered by chemical explosives – is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3Lxx2VAYi8
Very, very cool.
5 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- October 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (3)
- December 2008 (3)
- November 2008 (9)
- October 2008 (20)
- September 2008 (11)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (5)
-
Categories
- ABC
- Abengoa Solar
- abuse of units
- academia
- activism
- alternative energy
- americium
- Amory Lovins
- analytical science
- Andrew Bolt
- ANSTO
- anthropogenic climate change
- anthropogenic greenhouse gases
- anti-nuclear activism
- anti-nuclear ignorance
- anti-nuclear movement
- anti-nuclear quote of the day
- anti-nuclear quote of the week
- anti-nuclear-energy activism
- anti-nuclear-energy dogma
- anti-nuclear-energy ignorance
- anti-nuclear-energy stupidity
- atmospheric science
- atomic engines
- Australia
- Australia 2020
- Australian Greens
- AWU
- bad science
- banana dose
- Barack Obama
- beryllium
- black holes
- blogging
- blogs
- Blue marble
- books
- bullshit
- cap and trade
- carbon dioxide
- cargo cult science
- Carl Sagan
- CCS
- CERN
- chemistry
- Chernobyl
- China
- clean coal
- clean energy
- climate change
- coal
- coal mining
- community engagement
- construction time for nuclear energy
- construction time for renewable energy
- cost of solar energy
- cost of solar power
- cost of wind power
- dangerous fossil fuels
- David Lochbaum
- debate
- defence
- democracy
- depleted uranium
- desalination
- dirty bombs
- distributed energy
- dubious claims
- Earth Hour
- earth science
- economics
- economics of solar power
- education
- Edward Teller
- EFMR monitoring network
- electric vehicles
- electricity generation
- electronics
- emissions trading
- energy
- energy analysis
- energy conversion
- energy demand
- energy density
- energy economics
- energy generation
- energy independance
- energy intensity
- energy policy
- energy politics
- energy resources
- energy systems
- energy technology
- environment
- environmental protection
- environmental remediation
- environmental science
- environmentalism
- EROEI
- Europe
- fast reactors
- Feynman
- Fischer-Tropsch
- fossil fuel waste
- fossil fuels
- france
- free energy
- fruitcake
- FUD
- fuels
- fusion
- Garnaut review
- gas turbines
- Gavin Mudd
- geeky stuff
- genepax
- georeactor
- georeactor hypothesis
- geosequestration
- GNEP
- greenhouse forcing
- greenhouse gas emissions
- greenhouse gas emissions reduction
- greenhouse gases
- Hanford
- Hans Bethe
- health effects of energy systems
- health physics
- heat engines
- Helen Caldicott
- humor
- hydrogen
- HyperCar
- Hyperion
- IDGCC
- idiocy
- IFR
- industry
- Integral Fast Reactor
- IPCC
- Israel
- italy
- John Gofman
- John McCain
- John Wheeler
- Joseph Mangano
- Joseph Romm
- junk science
- Kansas
- Kashiwazaki-Kariwa
- Kentucky
- Kevin Rudd
- kilotons
- Kyoto protocol
- Large Hadron Collider
- LFTR
- LHC
- life-cycle analysis
- linear no-threshold
- linear-non-threshold
- linux.conf.au
- liquid fluoride reactor
- loan guarantees
- Manhattan Project
- Mark Lynas
- materials science
- media
- Media irresponsibility
- meet the millirem
- microcontrollers
- micropower
- Middle East
- mineral extraction
- mineral resources
- mining
- Naive Environmentalist Quote of the Day
- nanomaterials
- natural gas
- natural nuclear fission reactors
- neutrinos
- neutron science
- new build
- NNadir
- not even wrong
- nuclear astrophysics
- nuclear bailout
- nuclear chemistry
- nuclear debate
- nuclear energy
- nuclear energy economics
- nuclear energy institute
- nuclear engineering
- nuclear fission
- nuclear fuel cycle
- nuclear fuels
- nuclear fusion
- nuclear madness
- nuclear medicine
- nuclear physics
- nuclear power
- nuclear power education
- nuclear proliferation
- nuclear pulse propulsion
- nuclear reactors
- nuclear reprocessing
- nuclear safety
- nuclear terrorism
- nuclear waste
- nuclear weapons
- nukefree.org
- numbers
- Oklo
- olympic dam
- OPAL
- open hardware
- oxygen
- Paducah
- particle physics
- petroleum
- photovoltaics
- physics
- planetary science
- plutonium
- politics
- polling
- pollution
- probabilities
- proliferation
- proliferation studies
- propaganda
- psuedoscience
- public policy
- radiation
- radiation hormesis
- radiation safety
- radioactive decay
- radioactive waste
- radioactivity
- radionuclides in the environment
- radiophobia
- radon
- reactor physics
- reactor technology
- renewable energy
- renewable energy costs
- renewable energy economics
- renewables
- reprocessing
- resources
- rhetoric
- risk
- Rod Adams
- Russia
- safety of energy systems
- science
- scientific method
- Scott Ludlam
- SLS
- small-scale nuclear power
- society
- solar
- solar energy
- solar power
- solar thermal
- space exploration
- stars
- StormSmith
- sustainability
- sustainable energy
- synroc
- Syria
- terminology
- The Oil Drum
- their actions
- thermal engines
- thermodynamics
- thorium
- three mile island
- transportation
- Uncategorized
- unions
- units
- uranium
- uranium mining
- uranium resources
- van Leeuwen
- Victoria
- VVER
- waste
- water
- water use of energy systems
- white elephant
- wind energy
- wind power
- Yucca Mountain
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
In all fairness, the amount of fissile material required for a manned interstellar flight using nuclear-pulse propulsion is non-trivial- Freeman Dyson did some preliminary calculations on the subject back in the mid-1960s and found that it would take a considerable proportion of the accessible fissile material in the entire solar system (although I have no idea what they thought that figure was for the Sol system back in 1965). Besides, we need to build something like the Interstellar Planet Finder and locate some kind of habitable planet first.
But nuclear-pulse propulsion has a lot of potential for manned travel within the solar system as well. It could make it possible to transport a whole colony group to Mars, for example, using relatively near-term technology, and using amounts of nuclear fuel that we can produce using existing infrastructure. But sadly, I have a really hard time imagining governments ever actually pursuing this technology– especially since current trends are working against manned space flight.
If you haven’t read it, I heartily recommend George Dyson’s book on Project Orion.
For interstellar travel, I’m sure the use of deuterium-tritium fusion – even using current, mature technology, i.e. what is essentially a Teller-Ulam bomb – is the way to go, rather than using fission.
Well, the problem there is that you need to detonate it somehow (i.e., fission primaries)- and also that tritium is rare and consequently expensive. I think that the British Interplanetary Society did a study about thirty years ago of thermonuclear pulse propulsion for interstellar travel, but I think it used some sort of exotic laser detonation system.
The most economical concept I’ve seen for pulse propulsion is antimatter-initiated fusion. This requires a supply of frozen deuterium pellets and a small supply of antimatter (thankfully, since antimatter is extremely energy intensive to make). A pellet is ejected into the pulse explosion zone and a microgram (? or less?) quantity of antimatter sent to intercept it there. The matter/antimatter total destruction produces an energy release which initiates a fusion explosion in the deuterium pellet.
All theoretical, immense practical challenges to overcome, but very interesting.
Might it be more economical with fuel to take the process you describe and do it on a (much) smaller scale within some kind of magnetic nozzle, with more detonations? That way more of the momentum from the detonations would be imparted to the spacecraft. You could also potentially manipulate the magnetic field to increase fuel compression before ignition.