Bananas

The Committed Effective Dose Equivalent for K-40 is 5.02*10^-9 Sv/Bq or 1.86*10^-2 rem per microcurie ingested. (For the uninitiated, recall that 1 Sv = 100 rem.)

Recall from my previous post that a banana contains about 10.92 Bq of radioactive K-40.

Run the numbers, and you find that the CEDE from eating one single banana is about 0.005 millirem.

These numbers can vary all over the shop, depending what your source is for the Potassium concentration, and the banana mass, but one thing is clear.

Living within 50 miles of a nuclear power plant in the US exposes you to an average dose of 0.09 millirem per annum, or 1.64 Banana Units.

Annual dose from living within 50 miles of a coal fired power plant: 0.03 millirem, or 5.45 Banana Units.

This “Banana Dose” is perhaps very useful in attempting to explain infinitesmal doses to members of the public.
(Interestingly, some of the anti-nuclear people just HATE this supposedly deceptive concept.)

On units, doses, and physical realities.

If we’re going to talk about things like radioactivity and nuclear energy in a sensible, quantitative and scientifically sound way, we need to first establish some of the units and quantities involved, in an understandable way.

Firstly, we have the units of radioactivity, the Becquerel (Bq) and the Curie (Ci).

The Becquerel is a fundamental SI unit, simply 1 nuclear decay per second. As a fundamental SI unit, it is often used in professional and scientific literature.

But in the physical environment, 1 Bq is a very, very small thing, because 1 atom, or 1 nucleus, is a very, very small thing indeed.

Therefore, in practice, we usually consider multipliers on the units, such as kBq, MBq and so forth, as I’m sure we’re all familar with, from considering familar every day units such as the kilogram.

(I will take this opportunity to, once, apologize to readers of this blog in societies not yet illuminated by the wonders of the Metric System.)

The Curie (Ci) was originally defined as the radioactivity of 1 gram of Radium-226.

This corresponds to 37 GBq, or 37,000,000,000 Becquerel – 37 billion decaying Radium nuclei per second.

So, we see that in real-world contexts, 1 Bq really is very small.

Whilst the Curie is not fundamentally an SI based unit, it is very commonly encountered, and we see that it makes sense to use it in practical situations, instead of talking about billions or millions of Bq, although using the SI prefixes is acceptable, and SI-compatible, too.

1 Ci is actually a lot of radioactivity. Things such as medical diagnostics, medical treatment using radioisotopes, industrial gauges and radioisotopes used in scientific experiments typically involve on the order of 1-10 milliCuries.

Let’s consider a real-world example, in order to put, in context, just how small 1 Bq is, in the context of natural, background sources of radioactivity.

One average banana, or an avocado, contains about 500mg of natural Potassium, and all Potassium in nature contains 0.0117% Potassium-40, a radioactive beta emitter with a half-life of 1.277 billion years.

When discussing amounts of radioactive nuclide, it is often convenient to introduce a quantity called the specific activity, which is simply the amount of radioactivity per amount of mass of a given radionuclide.

The half-life of a radioactive nuclide is probably a concept all readers will be aware of.

The half-life of K-40 is 1.277 billion years, which means that over that amount of time, half the radioactive nuclei originally present in a sample will have decayed.

If we start with say 1g of K-40, there are (6.02*10^23 / 40) atoms present in the sample, where 40 is the atomic mass and 6.02*10^23 is Avogadro’s constant.

Thus, we can write down what the specific activity is, as 6.02*10^23 / (40 * 2 * 1.277*10^9 * 365.25 * 24 * 60 * 60) = 186.7 kBq /g, or 5.05 microcuries /g.

Therefore, a banana contains about 500*10^-3 * 0.0117*10^-2 * 186.7*10^3 = 10.92 Bq

That might not sound like much, and it isn’t, but it’s there, in every single banana, and all other fruits and vegetables, rocks and so forth.

And that’s only one radionuclide, Potassium-40. There are numerous other radionuclides which occur everywhere in nature and in your body, such as Carbon-14.

An average adult human contains, on average, 4000 Bq of K-40 and about 1200 Bq of C-14, amongst others. And that’s completely natural and normal.

One can calculate that solid Potassium Chloride contains about 16.35 Bq/kg in the form of K-40. From this, we can calculate that the 90 kBq released into the ocean following the effects of the widely publicised local earthquake on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear generating station is the equivalent of 5.5 kg of KCl being released, or about a carton and a half of a salt substitute for food, such as “No-Salt”.

The Canadian Nuclear Society has a detailed fact sheet available, with further information on the K-40 activity of various foods.

Now that we’ve established how radioactivity is measured, it’s important also to consider doses of radiation to the body, and how they’re measured.

The sievert (Sv) is the SI derived unit of dose equivalent. It reflects the biological effects of ionising radiation as opposed to the physical aspects, which are characterised by the absorbed dose, measured in grays.

One gray (Gy) is the absorption of one joule of radiation energy by one kilogram of matter.

The average radiation dose from an abdominal X-ray is 1.4 mGy, that from an abdominal CT scan is 8.0 mGy, that from a pelvic CT scan is 25 mGy, and that from a selective spiral CT scan of the abdomen and the pelvis is 30 mGy.

The biological effects vary by the type and energy of the radiation and the organism and tissues involved, and it’s here where units such as the Sievert are employed, so as to quantify the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure.

The equivalent dose to a tissue is found by multiplying the absorbed dose, in Gy, by a “quality factor” Q, dependent upon the type of radiation, and a factor N, dependent on other factors, such as the part of the body irradiated – for example, tissues such as the sex organs are more sensitive to radiation damage – and the time and volume over which the dose was spread.

For example, gamma photon or beta particle radiation has Q=1, but for alpha particle radiation from an alpha emitter ingested or inhaled into the body, Q = 20, a significant increase.

The natural background radiation dose varies considerably in different geographical locations, but typically is around 2.4 mSv annually. For cases involving high dose single-dose whole-body irradiation, 2-5 Sv causes nausea, hair loss, hemorrhage and acute radiation poisoning which can be fatal. More than 3 Sv will lead to death in 50% of cases within 30 days. Over 6 Sv or so, fatality is almost certain.

On blogging, and activism.

There are some anti-nuclear activists out there whose passion, determination and belief in what they do is an inspiration to everybody, everywhere, who’s ever contemplated any type of activism, on any level.

Take Dr. Helen Caldicott as an example. Caldicott is somewhat famous, across the world, not for being any kind of an authority on nuclear engineering, but primarily thanks to her unwavering, steadfast unwillingness to shut up and go away, even though she’s no stranger to criticism. When it comes to any type of activism, you’ve got to respect and admire that.

Caldicott, and others in the anti-nuclear movement, is a somewhat incredible person. She really does have spine, and she’ll (sometimes) give you a (reasonably) fair debate, face to face.

You can’t say the same for everybody in the anti-nuclear activism community.

Am I going to shut up and go away? Not any time soon.

I think DARPA let that incredible cat out of the bag, over 30 years ago. You can not stop the information.

Ultimately, the truth will always come out.

I’ll leave with you with an extract from a very famous speech by a very famous physicist. The anti-nuclear crowd probably won’t like it, but as a scientist, I believe in it.

There must be no barriers to freedom of inquiry. There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors. Our political life is also predicated on openness. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it and that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. And we know that as long as we are free to ask what we must, free to say what we think, free to think what we will, freedom can never be lost, and science can never regress.